neroteach.blogg.se

Legacy aldus photostyler
Legacy aldus photostyler










legacy aldus photostyler
  1. #Legacy aldus photostyler software
  2. #Legacy aldus photostyler Pc
  3. #Legacy aldus photostyler mac

#Legacy aldus photostyler mac

(Until recently, the only color management on the web was Internet Explorer which could use Mac ColorSync on Macs. I believe that PCs still do not support color management for multiple monitors. Macs allow individual simultaneous color profiles for multiple monitors. It is doable on PCs but is not automatic. Supporting multiple monitors, very useful for graphics, has been built into Macs for some years. It has been much more recent on PCs and it still is not fully integrated. Integrated color into the OS has been present on Macs for a long time. Microsoft and others immediately saw the value of color management and joined the ICC. Photoshop and Maya (video equivalent of Photoshop) came from the Mac side.

#Legacy aldus photostyler Pc

While many use PCs successfully for graphics applications, little new stuff has come from the PC side. If influence is defined as introducing innovative products and concepts, then it is probably true that PCs have had little influence in the graphics industry.

legacy aldus photostyler

The old Aldus operation, including AfterEffects engineering, is in Seattle. Adobe makes good stuff.a lot better than those The photography, graphic design, and advertising industries was

#Legacy aldus photostyler software

I suppose you could claim all the Windows sales of products like Photoshop, Quark, PageMaker, and Dreamweaver are going to posers who really aren't part of the "graphics industry." I have a fair bit of exposure to the customers who buy this sort of software and I assure you Windows is doing quite well with graphics professionals. For products with a history of strong Macintosh support, such as Photoshop, the Mac market is still quite profitable.ģ% marketshare for desktop personal computers, this indicates that it is still very strong in the graphics industry, but the large number of Windows sales indicates that it no longer has a lock on the game, or even a lead anymore. I don't have time to go dig public numbers out of the annual reports, but across the graphics software industry, Windows revenue dominates Mac revenue by a fair margin these days. The influence of the PC is the graphics industry is close to zero.įlat out false. Altsys merged with Macromedia shortly thereafter. It had little or nothing to do with competitive worries.)Īltsys, the developer of Freehand, which was also marketed by Aldus, opposed the acquisition and was able to regain control of their application and its marketing assets. (Adobe certainly wasn't going to maintain two programs that were that close in feature set. I'm sure ULead was compensated for lost future royalties. The marketing (including the name PhotoStyler) was all owned by Aldus I believe. They have to get rid of PhotoStyler and asked Ulead to accept a BigĬheck in exchange for not producing a CMYK photoediting program for Shortly after the merger, word came back that the Aldus people were flat stunned at the amount of revenue Photoshop was doing.) I worked on the Photoshop team at the time. (First shipping in 1993 or 1994.) PhotoStyler was one of the more credible competitors to Photoshop at the time but was not considered much of a threat within Adobe. Photoshop on the Mac predates PhotoStyler.

legacy aldus photostyler legacy aldus photostyler

Quark was starting to make inroads to the Windows page layout market.) (Their big problem was that PageMaker dominated their revenue and they were late with a new version. They perhaps weren't on a high growth path, but I don't recall that they were even losing money. Which in fact was made byĪldus when out of business and Adobe acquired their remainings.Īldus wasn't out of business when Adobe made the acquisition. 10 or 12 Years back the first 24bit color program for the PC was












Legacy aldus photostyler